It appears there's been a misunderstanding. My intention was not to present a conclusion, but rather to provide a synthesis of the ongoing debates in this field. I emphasized this by prefacing my comments with, "As far as I could understand, the controversy seems to be in three areas."

Regarding the third point, my statement was explicitly cautious: I clarified my position by stating my limitations in addressing this issue, acknowledging that as a cis-gender man without the relevant training or orientation that cis-women undergo, I'm not in a position to offer an educated opinion on this matter. Hence, i had zero opinions or conclusion on this.

In essence, my aim was to stay neutral and avoid drawing conclusions, highlighting my lack of qualification to comment on certain aspects of this sensitive topic.